Charles R. Warren v. United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILKEY.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG.
WILKEY, Circuit Judge:
The resolution by this and other courts of the question posed by this case may significantly affect the prospects for ongoing reform of the nation’s parole systems.
Like most of its state counterparts, the United States Board of Parole operated for many years under a statutory charter granting it almost unlimited and unreviewable discretion in parole decisionmaking. Because the Board was composed of less than ten members, its day-to-day decisions were of necessity…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Blair-Bey v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Rebecca S. DemareeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Conklin Wallace v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Stuart Jeffrey PaskowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.