Legal Opinion

Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1991No. 83982, (Calendar No. 2)PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

Two questions are presented in this appeal. First, whether plaintiffs have actions for breach of contract on the basis that they were informed of a particular compensation system upon entering defendant’s work force, and the system was subsequently changed. A subissue is whether those plaintiffs who were promised the policy would remain in force "forever” have actions for breach of contract. The second question is *525whether plaintiffs can maintain claims for unjust enrichment against defendant.

We hold that the Court of Appeals improperly determined that plaintiffs could maintain actions against…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. City of Lansing v. Township of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Miller v. Riata Cadillac CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Lynas v. Maxwell FarmsMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Iwanowa v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
  2. Morris Pumps v. Centerline Piping, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Ladas v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Barber v. Smh (Us), IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Aft Michigan v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API