Legal Opinion

Moore v. Nason

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Kent. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

Moore sued Nason in assumpsit on the common counts, filing a bill of particulars in which he claimed for work and labor on contract, commencing September 25, 1877, and until February 1st, 1878. The cause was tried by the circuit judge without a jury. From his.finding it appears-that on the 18th day of June, 1877, Nason verbally contracted to employ Moore for the period of a year, at the rate of three dollars per day; the employment to commence as soon ás a firm for whom plaintiff was then working could be suited with a man in his place; that on June 26, 1877, Moore began work under the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Landis v. W. H. Fuqua, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Paul v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Smith v. Chase & Baker Piano Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Hinchman v. Matheson Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API