Legal Opinion
Capon v. Monopoly Game LLC
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 4, 2011No. A124964PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMONS, J.
The Home Equity Sales Contract Act (HESCA or the Act) (Civ. Code, § 1695 et seq.),1 enacted in 1979, is designed to protect homeowners in default against unfair purchases of their home equity. The Act regulates transactions between an equity purchaser and an equity seller resulting in the sale of residential real property in foreclosure. Central to the legislative scheme is the requirement that the agreement between the buyer and seller be in writing and contain specific terms aimed at protecting the homeowner (§§ 1695.2, 1695.3, 1695.5). (Segura v. McBride (1992) 5…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Communist Party of the United States of Amerika v. 522 Valencia, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Rothschild v. Tyco Internationall (US), Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Minish v. Hanuman FellowshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Atempa v. Pedrazzani, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Citizens for a Better Eureka v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Atempa v. PedrazzaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Hall v. Warner Music Group Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.