Legal Opinion
Rothschild v. Tyco Internationall (US), Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 30, 2000No. D034567PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McINTYRE, J.
Marianne Rothschild filed an action against Tyco International (US), Inc. (Tyco), Watts Industries, Inc. (Watts), James Jones Co. (Jones), Mueller Co. (Mueller), Westbume Supply, Inc. and Marden Susco Company (collectively, the defendants), alleging that the defendants violated the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.; Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co. (1999) 20 Cal.4th 163, 169, fn. 2 [83 Cal.Rptr.2d 548, 973 P.2d 527]). The superior court sustained the defendants’ demurrer to Rothschild’s second amended complaint…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Springfield Terminal Railway Company David A. Fink v. Francis X. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Wohlgemuth v. Caterpillar Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative v. DIRECTV, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- People Ex Rel. Allstate Insurance v. WeitzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Ticconi v. Blue Shield of California Life & Health InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.