Peery v. Greensburgh, Kingston, & Clarksburgh Turnpike Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Decatur Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.
The appellee sued the appellant on a subscription of three shares of the capital stock of such company.
*322The complaint was in two paragraphs. A demurrer was overruled to each paragraph of the complaint, to which an exception was taken. The appellant refusing to plead further, final judgment was rendered for appellee.
The appellant has assigned for error the overruling of the demurrer to the complaint.
Counsel for appellant concede that the second paragraph of the complaint was probably good. We think it was good.
Counsel for appellee admit that the first paragraph was bad. Such an admission saves…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wolf v. SchofieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Blasingame v. BlasingameIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hawley v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Booher v. GoldsboroughIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Pennsylvania Co. v. HoldermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Springfield Engine & Thresher Co. v. KennedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PerkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.