Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Perkins

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1908No. 21,107PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Prom Benton Circuit Court; James T. Saunderson, Judge. Action by Emery Perkins against the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Lonis Railway Company. Prom a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for $25,000, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Appellee recovered a judgment on account of personal injuries received while in appellant’s service. The complaint consisted of two paragraphs, and was answered by a general denial. Demurrers to each paragraph of the complaint, on the ground that the facts therein contained were insufficient to constitute a cause of action, were overruled, and these rulings have been assigned as errors.

The first paragraph of complaint, omitting the caption, prayer and signature, is as follows: “The plaintiff complains of the defendant, and in complaining says: That by reason of the wrongs and injuries…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Laporte Carriage Co. v. SullenderIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Belt Railroad & Stock Yard Co. v. MannIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Malott v. SampleIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Wolf v. SchofieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Vandalia Railroad v. StillwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Fairbanks v. WarrumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Attica Building & Loan Ass'n v. ColvertIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Judah v. F. H. Cheyne Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Holliday & Wyon Co. v. O'DonnellIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API