Legal Opinion

Springfield Engine & Thresher Co. v. Kennedy

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1893No. 730PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From the Howard Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.

The appellant was the plaintiff below, and began this action to recover judgment on certain notes, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage securing the same. Pending the suit, the mortgaged property was seized and sold by the appellant under the stipulations contained in the said mortgage, so that the only controversy in this court is as to the right of appellant to a money judgment *504for the remainder due on the notes. The appellee answered in eleven paragraphs.

1st. That the notes in suit were executed without any consideration.

To the second a demurrer was sustained.

3d. That the notes were paid…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Conant v. National State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne, & Chicago Railway Co. v. RubyIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Phœnix Mutual Life Insurance v. HinesleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Hawley v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Robinson Machine Works v. ChandlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Aultman & Co. v. ForgeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Germania Fire Insurance v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Port Huron Engine & Thresher Co. Engine v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. IronsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Marion Manufacturing Co. v. HardingIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API