Legal Opinion
Dow Chemical Co. v. Ebling
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 3, 2000No. 22A05-9812-CV-625PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Todd and Cynthia Ebling, individually, as husband and wife, and as parents and natural guardians of Christina Ebling and Alex Ebling, (collectively, “the Eblings”) filed various state tort claims against The Dow Chemical Company, DowElaneo n/k/a Dow AgroSciences LLC, Eli Lilly & Company, Rofan Services, Inc. and Epco, Inc. (collectively, “DowElaneo”), Louisville Chemical Company (“LCC”), Affordable Pest Control (“Affordable”), and others. The Eblings generally allege that Christina and Alex developed seizure disorders and other health conditions as a…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Arnold v. Dow Chemical CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Dreyer v. Ryder Automotive Carrier Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Eyl v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Hathaway v. Cintas Corporate Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012
- Dow Chemical Co. v. EblingIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.