Legal Opinion

Dreyer v. Ryder Automotive Carrier Group, Inc.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided April 14, 2005No. 1:98-cr-00082PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

ARCARA, Chief Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Steven and Roberta Dreyer brought this action in products liability alleging that the defendants’ autohauler is defectively designed because it lacks a fall protection system. Steven Dreyer (“Dreyer”) operated the autohauler and during the unloading process he fell from the upper level and sustained several injuries for which he seeks compensation. Roberta Dreyer seeks damages for loss of consortium. Defendants contend that the auto-hauler is not defectively designed, that it is reasonably safe, that no alternative, safer designs…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Valente v. Textron, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  2. Floorgraphics, Inc. v. News America Marketing In-Store Services, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
  3. Monell v. Scooter Store, Ltd.District Court, N.D. New York · 2012
  4. Argonaut Insurance v. Samsung Heavy Industries Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 2013
  5. Globalrock Networks, Inc. v. MCI Communications Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API