Hathaway v. Cintas Corporate Services, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES T. MOODY, District Judge.
Defendant Cintas Corporate Services #2 d/b/a Cintas Corporation (“Cintas”) has moved for summary judgment on Counts I, II, and III of plaintiffs’ complaint. (DE # 105.) For the following reasons, that motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. Facts and Procedural History1
Plaintiff Rex Hathaway was employed as a welder/plasma torch operator at Quik Cut, Inc. (“Quik Cut”), a welding/plasma cutting company located in Allen County, IN. On February 12, 2009, Mr. Hathaway was operating a Pro Cut 80 plasma cutter, which was manufactured by…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Aregood v. Givaudan Flavors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Howard Piltch v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Hammons, P. v. Ethicon, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Piltch v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2014
- Bledsoe v. Medtronic, INC.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.