Legal Opinion

Hathaway v. Cintas Corporate Services, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided October 11, 2012No. 1:10 CV 195PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES T. MOODY, District Judge.

Defendant Cintas Corporate Services #2 d/b/a Cintas Corporation (“Cintas”) has moved for summary judgment on Counts I, II, and III of plaintiffs’ complaint. (DE # 105.) For the following reasons, that motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I. Facts and Procedural History1

Plaintiff Rex Hathaway was employed as a welder/plasma torch operator at Quik Cut, Inc. (“Quik Cut”), a welding/plasma cutting company located in Allen County, IN. On February 12, 2009, Mr. Hathaway was operating a Pro Cut 80 plasma cutter, which was manufactured by…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Aregood v. Givaudan Flavors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Howard Piltch v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  3. Hammons, P. v. Ethicon, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Piltch v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2014
  5. Bledsoe v. Medtronic, INC.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API