Legal Opinion
In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 5, 2013No. 11-CV-02509-LHKPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Michael Devine, Mark Fichtner, Siddarth Hariharan, Brandon Marshall, and Daniel Stover (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of a class of all those similarly situated, allege antitrust claims against their former employers, Adobe Systems Inc. (“Adobe”), Apple Inc. (“Apple”), Google Inc. (“Google”), Intel Corp. (“Intel”), Intuit Inc. (“Intuit”), Lucasfilm Ltd. (“Lucas-film”), and Pixar (collectively, “Defendants”), *559all of whom are high-tech companies with a principal…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jacob v. Duane Reade, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litig.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Soares v. Flowers Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
- In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.