Legal Opinion

Eric Allen Peterson v. Robert Lampert

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 14, 2003No. 00-35897PublishedCited by 412 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Eric Allen Peterson appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition based on his failure properly to exhaust in the Oregon state courts his ineffective assistance of counsel claim under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. We hold that Peterson did not fairly present his federal claim to the Oregon Supreme Court because, on the face of his petition for review in that court, he expressly limited his claim to Oregon constitutional law. We therefore affirm.

I

In 1992, Peterson pled guilty in…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by412 opinions

  1. Armando Castillo v. James McFadden Arizona Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. John Henry Casey v. Robert MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Gregory Dickens v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Wooten v. KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Davis v. SilvaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

407 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API