Legal Opinion

Cage v. Louisiana

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 13, 1990No. 89-7302PublishedCited by 1,072 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pau-peris and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

In state criminal trials, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment “protects the accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he is charged.” In re Winship, 397 U. S. 358, 364 (1970); see also Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307, 315-316 (1979). This reasonable-doubt standard “plays a vital role in the American scheme of criminal procedure.” Winship, 397 U. S., at 363. Among other…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Taylor v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. Franz ByrdCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,072 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

1,067 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API