Legal Opinion

Kosowska v. Khan

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided October 3, 1996No. 04-95-00217-CVPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARDBERGER, Justice.

This appeal presents issues concerning the enforceability of a Rule 11 agreement and duress. Kosowska, the appellant, appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of Khan in this Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) case. Because we believe that she entered into a valid and binding settlement agreement with Khan, we affirm.

Facts

Kosowska took her 1986 Volvo to the ap-pellee (Khan’s) garage, the Colonies North Exxon Car Care Center, where, she says, they totally destroyed her car’s engine. Ko-sowska filed suit against Khan on March 27, 1992 claiming that Khan…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Kennedy v. HydeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Raitano v. Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  4. Dimmitt v. RobbinsTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. King v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Alcantar v. Oklahoma National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Medrano v. City of Pearsall, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  3. Cantu v. Moore, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  4. Qwest Communications International, Inc. v. AT & T Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  5. Brown v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API