Medrano v. City of Pearsall
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.
Rick Medrano, Cain Medrano, and Jacob Medrano (“Medranos”) appeal a summary judgment granted in favor of the City of Pearsall (“City”) based on the City’s immunity defense. The Medranos contend that the trial court erred in granting the summary judgment because immunity was waived based on the use or misuse of non-defective tangible personal property. 1 We overrule this contention and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Standard of Review
The City’s amended motion for summary judgment requests summary judgment under both traditional summary judgment…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- City of Brownsville v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Trenholm v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- John Quinn v. Jesus GuerreroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- City of Midland v. Sullivan, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
- Thompson v. City of Corsicana Housing Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
- Scott v. Prairie View a & M University, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- HARRIS COUNTY, TX v. Cabazos, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.