Legal Opinion

Medrano v. City of Pearsall

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided February 3, 1999No. 04-98-00698-CVPublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.

Rick Medrano, Cain Medrano, and Jacob Medrano (“Medranos”) appeal a summary judgment granted in favor of the City of Pearsall (“City”) based on the City’s immunity defense. The Medranos contend that the trial court erred in granting the summary judgment because immunity was waived based on the use or misuse of non-defective tangible personal property. 1 We overrule this contention and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Standard of Review

The City’s amended motion for summary judgment requests summary judgment under both traditional summary judgment…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. City of Brownsville v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Trenholm v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. John Quinn v. Jesus GuerreroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  2. City of Midland v. Sullivan, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
  3. Thompson v. City of Corsicana Housing Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  4. Scott v. Prairie View a & M University, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  5. HARRIS COUNTY, TX v. Cabazos, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API