Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Hyde

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1984No. C-2930PublishedCited by 183 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Justice.

The question presented in this case is whether Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 11 bars enforcement of a disputed oral settlement agreement. Herman J. Smith sold capital stock in the Mansfield State Bank to a number of buyers, including Forrest L. Kennedy, Richard J. Hyde, and the other respondents in this cause. Subsequently, some of these purchasers, including Hyde, sued Kennedy and other defendants not appealing, seeking to recover interest paid to Smith for defendants’ benefit. Kennedy counterclaimed and also brought a third party action against Smith, alleging…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Burnaman v. HeatonTexas Supreme Court · 1951

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by183 opinions

  1. Adrian Cavallini v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Mobil Oil Corp. v. EllenderTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Williams v. KhalafTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Adams v. Petrade International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988

178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API