Legal Opinion

Alcantar v. Oklahoma National Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 31, 2001No. 2-99-304-CVPublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAUPHINOT, Justice.

Introduction and Procedural History

Paty Lou Alcantar appeals from the trial court’s enforcement of an alleged oral settlement agreement between Alcantar and Oklahoma National Bank (the Bank). Because we conclude the trial court erred in enforcing the settlement agreement, we reverse the trial court’s judgment.

The underlying case began as an inter-pleader action. Peavy & Peavy, L.L.P. (Peavy), a Texas law firm, represented Alcantar in an unrelated suit involving an automobile collision. That suit settled, and the settlement proceeds were deposited into Peavy’s trust…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Lane Bank Equipment Co. v. Smith Southern Equipment, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Kennedy v. HydeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. S & a RESTAURANT CORP. v. LealTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Samples Exterminators v. SamplesTexas Supreme Court · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Lynch, Inc. v. Samatamason Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. City of Roanoke v. Town of WestlakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. Penhollow Custom Homes, LLC v. Kim, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2010
  4. Robert P. Berg v. Kristi Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
  5. Neasbitt v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API