Legal Opinion
Cantu v. Moore
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided September 4, 2002No. 04-01-00524-CVPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by:
PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.
Mark Cantu (“Cantu”) appeals a judgment in a suit involving a claim for breach of a settlement agreement. Cantu raises two issues on appeal, contending: (1) the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict; and (2) the evidence was insufficient to support the award of attorneys’ fees. We overrule Cantu’s first issue, but we sustain Cantu’s second issue in part. We reverse the trial court’s judgment as to the award of conditional appellate attorneys’ fees and render judgment that the appellees are not entitled to recover appellate attorneys’ fees.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Qantel Business Systems, Inc. v. Custom Controls Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
- Banda v. Garcia Ex Rel. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Cullins v. Foster, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Woodhaven Partners, LTD v. Shamoun & Norman, LLP F/K/A Shoumoun Klatsky Norman, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- General Metal Fabricating Corporation, GMF Leasing Inc., and Arnold Curry v. John Stergiou and Main Marine Repair and Industrial Cleaning Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
- Heblen Kanan, Pharr Plantation Inc. and Pharr Plantation Management Co., Ltd. v. Plantation Homeowner's Association, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2013
- MKM Engineers, Inc. v. GuzderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.