State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Carter
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Yetka, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant landowners’ motion for allowance of reasonable attorneys fees incurred during litigation of eminent domain proceedings which culminated in a jury award in excess of both the initial amount offered by the plaintiff condemnor and the amount awarded by the condemnation commissioners. We affirm.
The issue is clearly drawn. Does the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution or Article 1, § 13, of the Minnesota Constitution require that attorneys fees be awarded to the condemnee as an element of “just…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Dade County v. BrighamSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Bowers v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Leadville Water Co. v. Parkville Water DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- City of Minnetonka v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Solko v. State Roads Commission of State Highway AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- United States v. 341.45 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1982
- Bush Terrace Homeowners Ass'n v. RidgewayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.