Legal Opinion

City of Thief River Falls v. Swick

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 11, 1973No. 43451PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented on this appeal is whether Minn. St. 1969, § 117.16, permitted the allowance of attorneys’ fees incurred in inverse condemnation proceedings which were dismissed when the original condemnation was discontinued. The trial court denied recovery and we affirm.

In 1969, the city of Thief River Falls began condemnation proceedings to acquire appellants’ land for a sewage treatment facility. Because the proposed use would affect the value of property not condemned, appellants commenced a mandamus suit to compel the city to award damages for other property they owned. Ultimately,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sipe v. KalitowskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. City of Bloomington v. MunsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API