Legal Opinion

City of Baxter v. City of Brainerd

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 2019No. A19-0097Published

1Opinion of the CourtSlieter, Judge

The City of Brainerd and Brainerd Public Utilities Commission (BPUC) challenge the district court's determination that the City of Baxter may impose a revenue-raising franchise fee on a municipally-owned utility. Because Baxter does not have statutory authority to impose its franchise fee on BPUC, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

Baxter, a statutory city,1 adopted an ordinance (ordinance 2016-0232 ) that imposed a revenue-raising franchise fee solely on BPUC to fund Baxter's pavement management and street- and traffic-lighting *480activities.3 Baxter sought to enforce ordinance 2016-023 on Brainerd and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Martinco v. HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet TahoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  4. Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald DriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API