City of Baxter v. City of Brainerd
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtSlieter, Judge
The City of Brainerd and Brainerd Public Utilities Commission (BPUC) challenge the district court's determination that the City of Baxter may impose a revenue-raising franchise fee on a municipally-owned utility. Because Baxter does not have statutory authority to impose its franchise fee on BPUC, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
Baxter, a statutory city,1 adopted an ordinance (ordinance 2016-0232 ) that imposed a revenue-raising franchise fee solely on BPUC to fund Baxter's pavement management and street- and traffic-lighting *480activities.3 Baxter sought to enforce ordinance 2016-023 on Brainerd and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Martinco v. HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet TahoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald DriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.