Beach v. Kerr Turbine Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
At Law. Action by Charles Beach against the Kerr Turbine Company. On motion to set aside service of summons.
1Opinion of the Court
WESTENHAVER, District Judge.
This action was begun in the state court, and after removal here by the defendant, a foreign corporation, it moves to set aside the summons. The return shows it was served on one J. W. Storer, describing him as “managing agent of said defendant company at Youngstown, Ohio.” Affidavits have been filed in support of the motion and in opposition thereto.
*707The affidavits in opposition state merely that Storer was the managing agent of the defendant, and as such managing agent had full charge and control of the work of installing certain turbines at Youngstown, Ohio. This…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Barrow Steamship Co. v. KaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Brennan v. TitusvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Thelma Scholnik v. National Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Fielding v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY AND CTY. OF SFCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Pacific Typesetting Co. v. International Typographical UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Bach v. Friden Calculating MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- Milbank v. Standard Motor Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.