Legal Opinion
Bach v. Friden Calculating MacH. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1948No. 10556PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
This prolonged litigation has been before us on two previous occasions. Its former appearances are reported in Bach v. Friden, 6 Cir., 148 F.2d 407, and Bach v. Friden, 6 Cir., 155 F.2d 361. In the instant case, the district court sustained the motion of appellee to quash the return of service of summons. The consequence is that, on the present appeal, the only question to be answered is whether the appellee, a California corporation, so transacted its business in Ohio as to make valid and effective service of process upon the particular person served as its “managing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Frene v. Louisville Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Mathews Conveyer Co. v. Palmer-Bee Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Steinway v. Majestic Amusement Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Echeverry v. Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Thelma Scholnik v. National Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.