Legal Opinion

Milbank v. Standard Motor Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1933No. Docket No. 7600PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendant, a New Jersey corporation, from a personal judgment rendered against it after default and subsequent to the denial of its motion made by special appearance to quash service of summons. The affidavit of service attached thereto recited that personal service had been made upon the defendant corporation “by serving Henry W. Runyon, Jr., its California business agent ...” The motion of the defendant challenged the sufficiency of the service of the summons under section 411 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which then read: “The summons must be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Davenport v. Superior Court of Imperial CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Gen. Conference of Free Baptists v. BerkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Jameson v. Simonds Saw Co.California Court of Appeal · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. L. D. Reeder Contractors of Arizona, an Arizona Corporation v. Higgins Industries, Inc., a Louisiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  2. Cosper v. Smith & Wesson Arms Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Woodworkers Tool Works v. ByrneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  4. Eclipse Fuel Engineering Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Carl FW Borgward, GMBH v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API