Barrow Steamship Co. v. Kane
Supreme Court of the United States
CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. This was an actiori brought November 1, 1894, in the Circuit Court of the1 United States for the Southern District of Néw York, by Michael Kane against the Barrow Steamship Company (Limited). The complaint alleged that the plaintiff was a citizen of New Jersey, and resided at Newark in that State; and that “ the defendant is a corporation organized and incorporated under the laws of the Kingdom of Great…
Read the full summary
CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. This was an actiori brought November 1, 1894, in the Circuit Court of the1 United States for the Southern District of Néw York, by Michael Kane against the Barrow Steamship Company (Limited). The complaint alleged that the plaintiff was a citizen of New Jersey, and resided at Newark in that State; and that “ the defendant is a corporation organized and incorporated under the laws of the Kingdom of Great Britain, and is the owner of a certain steamship known as the Devonia, and is and was at the time hereinafter mentioned a…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray
This action was .brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York against the Barrow Steamship Company, by a passenger on one of its steamships on a voyage from Lqndonderry in Ireland to the city of New York, for an assault upon him by its agents in the port of Londonderry. The certificate of the Circuit Court of Appeals show's that the plaintiff is a citizen and resident of the State of New Jersey; that the defendant is a corporation, organized and incorporated under the laws of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland; and a common carrier…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Lincoln County v. LuningSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by226 opinions
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
221 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.