Pacific Typesetting Co. v. International Typographical Union
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
The amended complaint of the appellant contains these allegations: that the plaintiff was the owner of a linotype, monotype and printing plant, valued at about $30,000, and in the operation of the plant employs a number of workmen, who were membeis of the International Typographical Union; that the business was increasing in volume, a substantial portion of which consisted of furnishing printing establis.iments with linotyping and mono typing; that the respondent International Typographical Union was a voluntary association, with many members, and that it was impracticable to bring all of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Barrow Steamship Co. v. KaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Pickett v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- J. F. Parkinson Co. v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Calbom v. KnudtzonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Jardine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- City of Seattle v. BlumeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- American Medical Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Hazen v. National Rifle Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.