Legal Opinion
Rexton, Inc. v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 6, 1994No. C3-94-407PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
Rexton, Inc. submitted a bid to supply hearing aids to respondent State of Minnesota, but its bid was rejected as untimely. Rexton appeals the trial court’s denial of its complaint for declaratory judgment, petition for alternative writ of mandamus, and motions for a temporary restraining order, or a temporary injunction and dismissal of its case with prejudice. We affirm.
FACTS
The State of Minnesota buys hearing aids for the state through the Department of Administration (department). On October 12, 1993, the department sent a letter to various manufacturers of hearing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Virginia v. Northland Office Properties Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Nielsen v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Eakman v. BrutgerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- County of Lake v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Borom v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dennis Simmons D.D.S., P.A. v. Modern Aero, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Holly's, Inc. v. County of GreensvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
- Power Sytems Analysis, Inc. v. City of BloomerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Quinn Construction Co. v. King County Fire Protection District No. 26Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Holly's, Inc. v. County of GreensvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.