Legal Opinion
Dennis Simmons D.D.S., P.A. v. Modern Aero, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 14, 1999No. C4-99-371PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s rejection of (1) his motion to amend the complaint to include a claim under Minnesota’s Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and (2) a jury instruction regarding the individual liability of respondent employees. Because appellant has failed to state a claim for relief under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and the rationale for his jury instruction misapplies the law, we affirm..FACTS
In 1990, one of respondent Modern Aero’s employees damaged a Beechcraft aircraft owned by appellant Dennis Simmons. Aero telephoned…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Alsides v. Brown Institute, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Lens Crafters, Inc. v. Vision World, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Tonka Corporation v. Tonk-A-Phone, Inc., Robert Albertson, D/B/A Tonka Tools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Watkins Incorporated v. Lloyd M. Lewis and Sandra G. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Damon v. GroteboerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Johnson v. Bobcat Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Superior Edge, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Issaenko v. University of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.