Legal Opinion
City of Virginia v. Northland Office Properties Ltd. Partnership
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 29, 1991No. C3-90-1581PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
'Respondent commenced this action to enforce a development agreement between it and appellants. Both parties moved for summary judgment and the trial court granted summary judgment for respondent.
FACTS
This case concerns the interpretation of section 10 of an agreement titled “Land Disposition Agreement and Contract Guaranteeing Development” (development agreement). Section 10 of the agreement provides:
CITY FINANCING
It is acknowledged by Developer and City that City is acquiring its funds for the purpose of obtaining the lands to be conveyed to Developer and for its…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Abdallah, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Niccum v. Hydra Tool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Carl Bolander & Sons Inc. v. United Stockyards Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Starr v. StarrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Blackburn, Nickels & Smith, Inc. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Winthrop Resources Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation v. Eaton Hydraulics, Inc., Formerly Known as Vickers, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Dawn Equipment Company, Plaintiff-Counterclaim and James H. Bassett, Counterclaim v. Micro-Trak Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium ProjectCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Maurice Sunderland Architecture, Inc. v. SimonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Burgmeier v. Farm Credit Bank of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.