Legal Opinion

Elbe Products Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 16, 1987No. Court No. 78-9-01642PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

This civil action involves the proper classification under the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), of a product called "Viledon heel grips”, manufactured in West Germany and imported into this country in 1977 in rolls of various lengths and approximately 5 to 10 inches in width.

The Customs Service of the United States (Customs) classified the merchandise under TSUS item 355.25, as non-woven fabrics, whether or not coated or filled, of man-made fibers, at a duty rate of 12 cents per pound plus 15 percent ad valorem.

It is plaintiffs claim that the merchandise is properly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Canadian Vinyl Industries, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  2. Marshall Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. C. Itoh & Co., America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  4. N. D. Cunningham & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Elbe Products Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Washington International Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  3. Takashima USA Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API