Legal Opinion

C. Itoh & Co., America, Inc. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 29, 1982No. Appeal No. 81-28PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade, 1 CIT-, 520 F.Supp. 273 (1981), holding that artificial suede imported from Japan was properly classified under item 355.25, Tariff Schedules of the United States (“TSUS”) as nonwoven fabric of textile materials, instead of under appellant’s claimed classifications, item 774.60, TSUS, as articles not specially provided for, of rubber or plastics, or item 359.60, TSUS, as textile fabrics, including laminated fabrics, not specially provided for. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

The merchandise involved was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. C. Itoh & Co. America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Daw Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Elbe Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  3. Greenhalgh Mills Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  4. Uniroyal, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  5. V. G. Nahrgang Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API