Legal Opinion

Washington International Insurance v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 6, 1992No. Court 84-05-00660PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AQUILINO, Judge:

This action, which has been designated a test case pursuant to CIT Rule 84(b), challenges classification by the U.S. Customs Service of imported single-ply modified bitumen roofing membrane under textile item 355.25 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (“TSUS”) (1981) (“Webs, wadding, batting, and non-woven fabrics, including felts and bonded fabrics, and articles not specially provided for of any one or combination of these products, all the foregoing, of textile materials, whether or not coated or filled: ... Of man-made fibers”). The merchandise, bearing the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Canadian Vinyl Industries, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  2. Canadian Vinyl Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  3. V.G. Nahrgang Co., F/a Anthony Paglialungo v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Elbe Products Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Elbe Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rocknel Fastener, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Washington International Insurance Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. Rocknel Fastener, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  4. IKO Industries Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API