Legal Opinion

Marshall Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 1, 1971No. C.D. 4291PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

This case, originally decided on December 18, 1970 (Marshall Co., Inc., Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni v. United States, 65 Cust. Ct. 629, C.D. 4148, 320 F. Supp. 1003 (1970)), is now before us upon additional evidence presented at a rehearing granted on timely motion made by defendant.

In the decision previously rendered, we held that the merchandise, rubber sheeting insulating material composed of rayon fabric coated *318or laminated with, rubber, the rubber forming the exposed surfaces of the merchandise, was properly dutiable as flexible strips, almost wholly of rubber, under item 771.42…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. Larry B. Watson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Briarcliff Clothes, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  5. Marshall Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Canadian Vinyl Industries, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  2. Canadian Vinyl Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  3. Oak Laminates Division of Oak Materials Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  4. Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
  5. United States v. Elbe Products Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API