Legal Opinion

Elbe Products Corp. v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 16, 1988No. 87-1619PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves the proper customs classification of “Viledon heel grips,” manufactured in West Germany and imported into this country in 1977. The Court of International Trade (trial court) held, after a trial, that the merchandise was properly classifiable (as claimed by plaintiff-appel-lee) under item 359.60, Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS). Elbe Products Corp. v. United States, 670 F.Supp. 362 (C.I.T.1987). The Government appeals and we affirm.

I

The Viledon heel grips, used in shoe manufacture, are made by a process combining, in two-steps, a fiber…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Elbe Products Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  2. Elbe Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Washington International Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  2. Spradling International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
  3. Bergen Hudson Roofing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  4. Guaina Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  5. Takashima USA Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API