Legal Opinion

United States v. Canadian Vinyl Industries, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 12, 1977No. C.A.D. 1189; No. 76-11PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge.1

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs ’Court, 76 Cust. Ct. 1, C.D. 4626, 408 F. Supp. 1377, sustaining ap-pellee’s claim that its imported merchandise is entitled to classification under item 771.40, Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), •instead of under item 355.82, TSUS, as classified. Appellee alternatively claimed classification under items 771.42, 774.60 and 355.85. We affirm.

The pertinent statutory provisions involved in this appeal, with ¡rates of duty in effect at time of importation, are as follows:

Tariff Schedules of the United States…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United China & Glass Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. American Customs Brokg. Co., Inc., A/c Hamakua Mill Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  4. Canadian Vinyl Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  5. Marshall Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Request for Assistance From Ministry of Legal Affairs of Trinidad and Tobago Petition of Joseph AzarCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  2. In Re Criminal Investigation No. 1-162Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Citizens to Save Spencer County v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  4. Citizens to Save Spencer County v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama Power Company, American Petroleum Institute, Sierra Club, Bf Goodrich Company, American Paper Institute, Hoosier Energy Division, Mountain Fuel Supply Company, Montana Power Co., Natural Resources Council of Maine, Pittston Co., Intervenors. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Montana Power Co., Intervenors. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Council of Maine, Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Bf Goodrich Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Hampton Roads Energy Company v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Northern Cheyenne Tribe, Sierra Club, and Friends of the Earth v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Montana Power Company v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pittston Company, Colorado Interstate Gas Co., Ideal Basic Industries, Inc., Intervenors. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, the Pittston Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, American Paper Institute and the National Forest Products Association v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Manufacturing Chemists Association, Chemical Products Corporation, Dow Chemical Company, Fmc Corporation, Monsanto Company, Ppg Industries, Inc., Rohm and Haas Company, Stauffer Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation, Allied Chemical Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama By-Products Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Koppers Company, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of Epa, Usm Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, EpaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  5. Amchem Products, Inc. v. Gaf Corporation and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API