Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Casey v. Fortune

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1947No. Civ. 15460PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

This is an action for damages sustained by plaintiff as the result of a collision between an automobile operated by Robert Fortune and a motorcycle operated by plaintiff. Defendant Amanda Fortune is the owner of the automobile and the mother of Robert. Trial was without a jury. Judgment was for plaintiff against both defendants in the sum of $4,824.67. Amanda Fortune appeals from the. judgment.

The accident occurred on July 10, 1944, at which time defendant Robert Fortune was 16 years of age, and had no license to operate an automobile. His parents were divorced, and the custody of said minor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Krum v. MalloyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Burgess v. CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Boland v. GosserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Flemmer v. MoncktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Grieger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. Consolidated FreightwaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Elkinton v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Caccamo v. SwanstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Scheff v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API