Legal Opinion

Elkinton v. California State Automobile Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 1959No. Civ. 18378PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAGLER, J. pro tem. *

Defendant has appealed from a judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict holding it liable under a policy of indemnity insurance issued to one Amber G. Fannon. Defendant also appeals from an order denying its motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The policy by its terms bound the defendant to indemnify the named assured, and any person who might drive her Cadillac automobile with her consent, against liability up to $10,000 on account of personal injuries, and up to $5,000 on account of property damage, sustained by other persons through such operation of said…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Grieger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. Consolidated FreightwaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Home Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Pritchett v. Kimberling Cove, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  5. Steele v. NagelIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API