Flemmer v. Monckton
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
The present controversy arose out of a collision between a Studebaker pickup truck owned by the defendant Monckton, which was then being driven by his employee, .the defendant LaLonde, and a car driven by the plaintiff Albert E. Berreth, with whom his wife, Huida Berreth, and Harlan Flemmer and Eleanor Flemmer, his wife, were riding. By stipulation of the parties, the separate actions filed by the Berreths and Flemmers against Monckton and LaLonde were consolidated for the purposes of trial and appeal. The trial court, sitting without a jury, made findings in favor of plaintiffs on all the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
- DeYoung v. DeYoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Peterson v. Grieger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Casey v. FortuneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Financial Indemnity Co. v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Scheff v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Taylor v. Roseville Toyota, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.