Legal Opinion

Hillen v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1926No. Docket No. S.F. 12001PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

The petitioners sought and obtained a writ of certiorari to review a decision of the Industrial Accident Commission awarding Frank M. Downing compensation for injuries received while shingling a building, the sole question presented being whether or not Downing was an independent contractor or an employee of the petitioner Hillen. It was stipulated before the Commission that if Downing was in fact an employee of Hillen, the injury he received arose out of and in the course of his employment.

The facts are without conflict. Hillen was engaged in the business of building and selling homes in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Press Publishing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. G. L. Eastman Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Tuttle v. Embury-Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Industrial Commission v. BonfilsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Ayala v. Antelope Valley Newspapers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Robinson v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. In-Home Supportive Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Industrial Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API