Legal Opinion

United States v. Phillips

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided May 13, 2003No. 02-0657/AFPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge CRAWFORD

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Pursuant to her pleas, Appellant was convicted of making a false official statement, wrongfully using marijuana, and conduct unbecoming an officer by seeking a substitute urine sample, in violation of Articles 107, 112a, and 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 907, 912a, and 933 (2000). The convening authority approved a sentence of dismissal and confinement for 45 days. The Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence, United States v. Phillips, 56 M.J. 843…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Solorio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. GarciaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. ColeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. SchultzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  5. United States v. ClineUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. MoritaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  2. United States v. MoritaUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
  3. United States v. FryCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
  4. Lawrence v. MaksymNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  5. United States v. Sergeant STEVEN E. WOLPERTArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API