United States v. Fry
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted review to determine whether jurisdiction existed pursuant to Article 2, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 802 (2006), to try Appellant in a court-martial, despite an order from a California court that established a limited conser-*467vatorship over Appellant. We hold that jurisdiction existed pursuant to Article 2(e).1
I
In accordance with Appellant’s pleas, a general court-martial by military judge alone found Appellant guilty of two specifications of being absent without leave, four specifications of possessing child…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Ashcroft v. al-KiddSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. MoritaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. NettlesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. FryCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
- United States v. MoritaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. SaundersUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015