United States v. Sergeant STEVEN E. WOLPERT
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT AND ACTION ON APPEAL BY THE UNITED STATES FILED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 62, UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE
CAMPANELLA, Senior Judge:
In this case, we analyze personal jurisdiction over appellee, a member of the reserve component, who allegedly committed criminal acts between periods of inactive-duty training (IDT). We conclude jurisdiction under Articles 2(a)(3) and 2(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ] does not exist.
Appellee was charged with one specification of maltreatment, three specifications of sexual assault, one specification of abusive sexual…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Solorio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. GoreCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. AliCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
- United States v. HarmonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adam S. Childers v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
- Pipes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- United States v. HaleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2019