Legal Opinion

United States v. Sergeant STEVEN E. WOLPERT

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided September 22, 2016No. ARMY MISC 20160437PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT AND ACTION ON APPEAL BY THE UNITED STATES FILED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 62, UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE

CAMPANELLA, Senior Judge:

In this case, we analyze personal jurisdiction over appellee, a member of the reserve component, who allegedly committed criminal acts between periods of inactive-duty training (IDT). We conclude jurisdiction under Articles 2(a)(3) and 2(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ] does not exist.

Appellee was charged with one specification of maltreatment, three specifications of sexual assault, one specification of abusive sexual…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Solorio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. GoreCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  4. United States v. AliCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
  5. United States v. HarmonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adam S. Childers v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  2. Pipes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  3. United States v. HaleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API