Lawrence v. Maksym
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARVER, Judge:
Petitioner comes before us to request extraordinary relief under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), in the nature of a writ of prohibition to prevent the court-martial from proceeding or, alternatively, a writ of mandamus to direct the military judge to dismiss the charges. He contends that the court-martial lacks personal jurisdiction over him, because there is no authority to recall him to active duty from the inactive reserves for trial by court-martial. This court has the authority to grant the extraordinary relief requested to ensure the integrity of the judicial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States Ex Rel. Hirshberg v. CookeSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. LabellaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. MelansonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. DingerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010