Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Maksym

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided June 25, 2003No. NMCM 200300173PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARVER, Judge:

Petitioner comes before us to request extraordinary relief under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), in the nature of a writ of prohibition to prevent the court-martial from proceeding or, alternatively, a writ of mandamus to direct the military judge to dismiss the charges. He contends that the court-martial lacks personal jurisdiction over him, because there is no authority to recall him to active duty from the inactive reserves for trial by court-martial. This court has the authority to grant the extraordinary relief requested to ensure the integrity of the judicial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. United States Ex Rel. Hirshberg v. CookeSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. LabellaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. MelansonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  5. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  2. United States v. DingerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  3. United States v. EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API