Yucaipa Farmers Cooperative Ass'n v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
A writ of review was heretofore issued under the apprehension that at the time she received her injuries respondent Rosetta Fennell was an employee of respondent Thompson and not of Yucaipa Farmers Cooperative Association, hereinafter referred to as Yucaipa. Upon a more thorough study of the case we have derived a different conclusion.
June 21, 1941, Mrs. Fennell accompanied by her husband and Mr. and Mrs. Beatty called at the office of Yucaipa in quest of employment to pick cherries. They were told by the party in charge that Yucaipa had no need of laborers but that Mr. Thompson needed some…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Press Publishing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Chapman v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Cowell v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
3Cited by26 opinions
- Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Burlingham v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hardin v. ElvitskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Mantonya v. BratlieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.