Legal Opinion

Mantonya v. Bratlie

California Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1948No. L. A. 20649PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict for plaintiff. The plaintiff’s factual theory of this action for damages for personal injuries, as alleged in the complaint, is that “defendants employed plaintiff as a ranch and farm laborer . . . ; that among his duties plaintiff was required to and did operate ... a certain tractor; that said tractor was in need of repairs and was in a dangerous and defective condition . . . That the' dangerous and defective condition of said tractor . . . was well known to defendants, but defendants failed, refused and neglected to have…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Wallis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Burlingham v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. S. A. Gerrard Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Riskin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. In Re Coupon Clearing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Sheffet v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Magnecomp Corp. v. Athene Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API