Mantonya v. Bratlie
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict for plaintiff. The plaintiff’s factual theory of this action for damages for personal injuries, as alleged in the complaint, is that “defendants employed plaintiff as a ranch and farm laborer . . . ; that among his duties plaintiff was required to and did operate ... a certain tractor; that said tractor was in need of repairs and was in a dangerous and defective condition . . . That the' dangerous and defective condition of said tractor . . . was well known to defendants, but defendants failed, refused and neglected to have…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Wallis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Burlingham v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- S. A. Gerrard Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Riskin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- In Re Coupon Clearing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Sheffet v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Magnecomp Corp. v. Athene Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.