Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Edwards

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1933No. Docket No. 7797PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This was an action to recover damages as a result of the death of one Charles Jesse Chapman. The action was against L. E. Edwards and C. A. Edwards as copartners doing business under the firm name ■and style of “Edwards Bros.” and against one John Klein as an individual. The cause of action was based upon the theory that the death of Chapman was caused by the negli- • gence of the defendants. This brief statement will suffice as a general statement, inasmuch as the sole point to be considered does not require further detail.

After trial by jury a verdict was returned in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Press Publishing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hillen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Murray's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  5. Western Pac. R. R. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Robinson v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Burlingham v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Brubaker v. Glenrock Lodge International Order of Odd FellowsWyoming Supreme Court · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API