Palmtag v. Doutrick
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in the Twentieth District Court, County of San Benito. Belden, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Thornton, J.:
In this action, which was for the recovery of the possession of a piano, on a trial by the Court, plaintiff recovered judgment, and defendant appealed.
The points to be considered arise on the findings of fact, which, with the conclusions of law, are here inserted:
“ 1. In the month of November, 1876, one George Riegart was the owner of a number of musical instruments, pianos, organs, etc., that were then at the hall and building of Peter Folger, in the town of Watsonville, Santa Cruz County.
“2. Riegart was at the same time indebted to Folger in the sum of about one thousand six…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Williamson v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Tewksbury v. MagraffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Fair v. StevenotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Bates v. StantonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1852
- King v. RichardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jeffers v. Easton, Eldridge & Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Voss v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- American Pig Iron Storage Warrant Co. v. GermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Dreyfus v. HirtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Telegraph Avenue Corp. v. RaentschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.