Legal Opinion
Williams v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 25, 1996No. C9-94-2257PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COYNE, Justice.
We entertain review on petition of St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center to consider the question of whether, where the plaintiff has asserted a reprisal claim under the Minnesota Human Rights Act, the exclusivity of remedies provision of that Act, Minn.Stat. § 363.11 (1994), operates as a bar to a retaliation claim asserted pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 181.932, subd. 1(a) (1994), the Whistleblower Act. In reversing the summary judgment entered in favor of the employer, the court of appeals held that the retaliation claim was not preempted by the exclusivity provision, that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Karst v. FC Hayer Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Petroskey v. Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Vonch v. Carlson Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- John E. Petroskey v. Lommen, Nelson, Cole, and Stageberg, P.A., a Professional Corporation, and Phillip A. Cole, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Abraham v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Obst v. Microtron, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Kratzer v. Welsh Companies, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women's Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.