Legal Opinion

Mangos v. Mangos

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 16, 1962No. 38,693PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

This appeal from a judgment arises out of an action in district court for a partnership accounting and for damages resulting from alleged fraudulent misrepresentations by which the representative of the estate of a deceased partner was induced to divide partnership assets with a surviving partner.

The numerous assignments of error present only the questions of whether the evidence supports the findings and whether the district court had jurisdiction to order the entry of a money judgment against an estate during pendency of probate proceedings.

Briefly, the evidence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Larson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Fulton v. OkesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. Scott v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. MullinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Bogestad v. BothumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Page v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Qualley v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re the Trusteeship Created by the SheridanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Jinadu v. Centrust Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API